Difference between revisions of "V1.4 SP10.0"
From FPDS-NG
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 1100px"> | <TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 1100px"> | ||
<th width=10% align="center"><b>SPR #</b></th><th width=30%><b>Problem</b></th><th width=80%><b>Solution</b></th><th width=25% align="center"><b>Impact to Users and Integrators</b></th> | <th width=10% align="center"><b>SPR #</b></th><th width=30%><b>Problem</b></th><th width=80%><b>Solution</b></th><th width=25% align="center"><b>Impact to Users and Integrators</b></th> | ||
+ | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 1</td> | <td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 1</td> | ||
Line 74: | Line 75: | ||
<b>4004 - “The value "<<value>>" for Data Element "Type of Set Aside" is invalid.”</b> | <b>4004 - “The value "<<value>>" for Data Element "Type of Set Aside" is invalid.”</b> | ||
− | *The new values for “Type of Set Aside” are valid only effective 18th March 2011. FPDS-NG will display the following Validation Rule if the new values for “Type of Set Aside” are selected and the “Date Signed” of the contract is prior to | + | *The new values for “Type of Set Aside” are valid only effective 18th March 2011. FPDS-NG will display the following Validation Rule if the new values for “Type of Set Aside” are selected and the “Date Signed” of the contract is prior to '4/01/2011': |
− | "If "Type of Set Aside" is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the “Date Signed” must be equal or later than | + | "If "Type of Set Aside" is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the “Date Signed” must be equal or later than ‘4/01/2011’" |
*FPDS-NG will display the following Validation rule on base Award and IDV if the “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Women Owned Small Business” and the Vendor does not have any of the new flags (WOSB, JVWOSB, EDWOSB or EDJVWOSB): | *FPDS-NG will display the following Validation rule on base Award and IDV if the “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Women Owned Small Business” and the Vendor does not have any of the new flags (WOSB, JVWOSB, EDWOSB or EDJVWOSB): | ||
− | <b>“If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Joint Venture Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”</b> | + | <b>10N33 - “If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Joint Venture Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”</b> |
*FPDS-NG will display the following Validation rule on base Award and IDV if the “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business” and the Vendor does not have the new flags (EDWOSB or EDJVWOSB): | *FPDS-NG will display the following Validation rule on base Award and IDV if the “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business” and the Vendor does not have the new flags (EDWOSB or EDJVWOSB): | ||
− | <b>“If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”</b> | + | <b> 10N34 - “If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”</b> |
*All Validation Rules mentioned above will be displayed on the following operations: | *All Validation Rules mentioned above will be displayed on the following operations: | ||
Line 91: | Line 92: | ||
**‘isComplete’, ‘isExistingAwardComplete’, ‘isExistingIDVComplete’, ‘approve’ and ‘correct’ operations through Business Services. | **‘isComplete’, ‘isExistingAwardComplete’, ‘isExistingIDVComplete’, ‘approve’ and ‘correct’ operations through Business Services. | ||
− | * | + | *The Validation Rules 10N33 and 10N34 apply to Version 1.4 only. |
</td> | </td> | ||
<td valign="top">No</td> | <td valign="top">No</td> | ||
Line 222: | Line 223: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-48</td> | <td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-48</td> | ||
− | <td valign="top">CCR has started sending the new WOSB flags vendors with 2/22/2011. However, FPDS-NG will be able to accept and process the new flags in production from | + | <td valign="top">CCR has started sending the new WOSB flags vendors with 2/22/2011. However, FPDS-NG will be able to accept and process the new flags in production from 04/01/2011. Thus, FPDS-NG will not have the flags checked for the contracts having these vendors. </td> |
<td> | <td> | ||
*FPDS-NG shall have a Data Management Fix to update all the Vendors that have the new WOSB flags in CCR. | *FPDS-NG shall have a Data Management Fix to update all the Vendors that have the new WOSB flags in CCR. |
Latest revision as of 23:17, 9 May 2011
Schedule
Description | Start Date | End Date |
---|---|---|
BETA Installation | Monday March 7, 2011 | Monday March 7, 2011 |
Functional Qualification Testing | Tuesday March 8, 2011 | Thursday March 10, 2011 |
Installation in Production | Friday April 1, 2011 | Friday April 1, 2011 |
Document Changes
Documentation | Changes Required |
---|---|
XML Specifications | No |
Web Services | No |
Data Dictionary | Yes |
NASA Specific Data Dictionary | No |
Use Case Summary | Yes |
Validation Rules | Yes |
Online Help | No |
Computer-Based Training | No |
Report Manual | No |
SPR Listing
SPR # | Problem | Solution | Impact to Users and Integrators |
---|---|---|---|
FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 1 | To support the Small Business Administration’s Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) program, FPDS-NG shall add four new Vendor Socio Economic Indicators and two new Set-Asides. Additional information can be obtained from the following URL (http://www.sba.gov/content/contracting-opportunities-women-owned-small-businesses)
The four new Vendor Socio Economic Indicators are:
|
Note:
1. On ‘Correct’ operation for contracts in Version 1.3 and below, the flags will be updated only if the Vendor is changed.
|
No |
FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 2 | To facilitate the new Vendor Socio Economic Indicator as a part of the new Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) program, two new values for “Type of Set Aside” have to be added to FPDS-NG Version 1.4: 1. Women-Owned Small Business New Validation Rules have to added to address the new values for "Type of Set Aside". |
4004 - “The value "<<value>>" for Data Element "Type of Set Aside" is invalid.”
"If "Type of Set Aside" is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the “Date Signed” must be equal or later than ‘4/01/2011’"
10N33 - “If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Joint Venture Women-Owned Small Business’, ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”
10N34 - “If “Type of Set Aside” is ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ the Vendor must be ‘Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’ or ‘Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business’.”
|
No |
FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 3 | To address the new values for Type of Set Asides, the existing Validation Rules have to be modified for Version 1.4. |
Note: The Validation Rules do not apply to NASA Specific Awards but the flags will be stored on them.
Current Validation Rule 10N02 (Version 1.3 and lower): New Validation Rule (Starting Version 1.4):
Current Validation Rule 10N05A(Version 1.3 and lower): New Validation Rule (Starting Version 1.4):
Current Validation Rule 10N06A(Version 1.3 and lower): New Validation Rule (Starting Version 1.4):
Current Validation Rule 10N07A(Version 1.3 and lower): New Validation Rule (Starting Version 1.4):
Current Validation Rule 10N07A(Version 1.3 and lower): New Validation Rule (Starting Version 1.4): |
No |
FPDSPMOS-48 - Work Package 4 | All Reporting entities have to be modified to address the new Vendor Flags under Socio-Economic Indicators and the new values for "Type of Set Aside" |
|
No |
FPDSHD-84391 | The ATOM FEED Specifications contain "transactionSource" XML tag under "transactionInformation", however it does not contain any value. | FPDS-NG will update the Award and IDV ATOM FEED specifications for all versions to remove “transactionSource” XML Tag from “transactionInformation”. | Yes |
FPDSPMOS-48 | CCR has started sending the new WOSB flags vendors with 2/22/2011. However, FPDS-NG will be able to accept and process the new flags in production from 04/01/2011. Thus, FPDS-NG will not have the flags checked for the contracts having these vendors. |
|
No |
FPDSHD-82566 | In Small Business Goaling and Small Business Achievements by Awarding Organization Reports, the "Type of Set Aside" on 1.4 BOAs and Part 13 BPAs are taken into consideration for Part 13 BPA Calls and DOs referencing BOAs. "Type of Set Aside" on those contracts will always be empty. |
|
No |
FPDSHD-85376 | There is an issue on 'Correct' of IDV which allows the vendor information on Referencing Awards to be different from their Referenced IDVs. |
The Data Element "Contracting Officer’s Business Size Selection", "Contractor Name" (Version 1.3 and below) and "CCR Exception" should be propagated along with all the other vendor information from the IDV to the respective modification or base Delivery Order based on the "Date Signed" on 'Correct' or 'Approve' of the IDV.
|
No |